Jeanine Pirro makes her TV show debut Monday
-
- September
- 16
Westchester’s former firecracker district attorney Jeanine Pirro will begin her judge show on the CW network on Monday.
Pirro enters a crowded pool of TV judge shows already out there, but if she’s as animated on television as she is in real life, I think she’ll do fine.
Let’s just hope her whacky ex-husband doesn’t ruin this one like he did with Jeanine’s political career, hehehe.
(Photo by Ricky Flores/The Journal News )
This entry was posted
on Tuesday, September 16th, 2008 at 4:43 pm by Aman Ali.
You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed.
Category: Jeanine Pirro
|
Leave a Reply
It is a condition of your use of the comment features associated with the blogs that you do not: Use the site to post or transmit any unlawful, threatening, abusive, libelous, defamatory, obscene, vulgar, pornographic, profane or indecent information of any kind, including without limitation any transmissions constituting or encouraging conduct that would constitute a criminal offense, give rise to civil liability or otherwise violate any local, state, national or international law. You alone are responsible for the material you post or send. Refer to the
Terms of Service.
Dear Judge Pirro, Your ruling in today’s airing (11/19/08) of the case of Rico Casanova vs. his daughter, Jessica Maldanado, contained some outrageous remarks that if uttered in a case where the parent was a mother suing her daughter would have clearly been out-of-line. How dare you suggest that because Rico’s first wife left with a drug dealer and that because Rico had medical problems at the time, Jessica and her siblings should be grateful to have had a “decent” father who didn’t simply put them in foster care or dump them on a “relative to raise”? If that had been Jessica’s mother suing her, she would have been chastised for having picked the jerk in the first place. Then you insinuate that he wasn’t just as responsible for his second wife’s physical abuse of his children as she was while he goes on to make comments about his daughter’s weight on national t.v.! You would have crucified a mother for behaving that way or allowing a subsequent husband to abuse her children from a first marriage! I had breast cancer and was going through chemotherapy following a mastectomy and a hip replacement caused by other medical conditions when my ex walked out on me and the kids for a multi-millionaire childless divorcee (who got her millions by marrying and then divorcing one of the richest men in our community of Naples, FL who also happened to be my ex’s best friend) who could support him in a carefree lifestyle. Nobody ever insinuated I was doing anything other than my job as a mother to have maintained as stable a home life as possible for my children and certainly no one every suggested it was noble of me to have NOT TURNED MY KIDS OVER TO FOSTER CARE which you actually praised this idiot for not doing considering his overwhelming circumstances! In fact, I continued to open our home to foster children the same as I had done for the previous 15 years. I’m now 54 and totally disabled looking forward to a third hip replacement following spine surgery because my ex couldn’t be bothered to pay what the court ordered and I had to continue to work despite my medical problems to make sure my kids were housed, fed, etc. No one ever called me a ‘great person’, or ‘special’ for having done so. Why is it that the bar by which we judge divorced fathers is set so low that you could actually praise that man in front of two of his very emotionally distraught daughters when you would have berated any mother who behaved the way he did and now have also lowered the bar for his three children to believe their children don’t deserve anything better than what they got as a father? Although in terms of the case and the law, your ruling was correct, your comments had nothing whatsoever to do with the legal issue at hand and were unbelievably off subject and detrimental to everyone who heard them. You owe single mothers and the children they’ve raised who’ve been neglected by their fathers everywhere a huge apology!
November 28, 2008
Dear Judge Pirro,
Occasionally I watched your show in California. However, it appears to me that your show is centered on spousal abuse. I have no disagreements regarding spousal abuse if it is use legitimately. My disagreement is when a woman uses spousal abuse for the sole purpose of obtaining an INS permanent green card or for the wrong purpose. It would be nice if you inform women who misused this law for the wrong purpose. Likewise, when judges act stupid and do not ask the questions like doctor’s and police’s report it becomes injustice to the man. Please, keep that in mind when you talk about justice.
You talked about Justice on your television show but I do not think you are for real. It is my understanding that your T.V show centers on Small Claim Suite – not on spousal abuse. If that is your objective then you should disclosure that your show is about spousal abuse – the objective.
Mr. Life
Wow you are the most beautiful judge I ever saw. When ever I know you are on fox I am there good job xoxo Joe