<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><!-- generator="wordpress/wordpress-mu-1.2.5" -->
<rss version="2.0" 
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: EXCLUSIVE: There will be Oscar Specials</title>
	<link>http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/22/there-will-be-oscar-specials/</link>
	<description>Stalking Lower Hudson Valley Celebrities ... So You Don't Have To</description>
	<pubDate>Sat,  5 Jul 2008 09:12:36 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=wordpress-mu-1.2.5</generator>

	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Serico</title>
		<link>http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/22/there-will-be-oscar-specials/#comment-97039</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Serico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/22/there-will-be-oscar-specials/#comment-97039</guid>
		<description>Point taken, RD.

Even though your list accounts for only about half the films to win best picture since 1990, the point I was trying to make was that box office blockbusters don't always translate into critical and Academy success.

In addition, I'm guessing the vast majority of Best Picture NOMINEES, which we were discussing in the segment, make even less money on average than, say, your typical summer movie season.

But thanks for the kind words!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Point taken, RD.</p>
<p>Even though your list accounts for only about half the films to win best picture since 1990, the point I was trying to make was that box office blockbusters don't always translate into critical and Academy success.</p>
<p>In addition, I'm guessing the vast majority of Best Picture NOMINEES, which we were discussing in the segment, make even less money on average than, say, your typical summer movie season.</p>
<p>But thanks for the kind words!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Roseanna Danna</title>
		<link>http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/22/there-will-be-oscar-specials/#comment-96918</link>
		<dc:creator>Roseanna Danna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 03:59:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid>http://suburbarazzi.lohudblogs.com/2008/02/22/there-will-be-oscar-specials/#comment-96918</guid>
		<description>Best Picture winners other than Titanic that were box-office smashes before winning the Oscar (since 1990):

Forrest Gump
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King
The Departed
Gladiator
Shakespeare in Love
Braveheart
Schindler's List
Dances with Wolves
Silence of the Lambs

But, hey, what kind of journalists need to check their sources before appearing on TV and looking like buffoons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Best Picture winners other than Titanic that were box-office smashes before winning the Oscar (since 1990):</p>
<p>Forrest Gump<br />
Lord of the Rings: Return of the King<br />
The Departed<br />
Gladiator<br />
Shakespeare in Love<br />
Braveheart<br />
Schindler's List<br />
Dances with Wolves<br />
Silence of the Lambs</p>
<p>But, hey, what kind of journalists need to check their sources before appearing on TV and looking like buffoons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
